Site Logo E-PROJECTTOPICS

DUTIES AND POSITION OF COMPANY DIRECTORS UNDER NIGERIAN COMPANY LAW


Presented To


Law Department

πŸ“„ Pages: 65       🧠 Words: 8517       πŸ“š Chapters: 5 πŸ—‚οΈοΈ For: PROJECT

πŸ‘οΈβ€πŸ—¨οΈοΈοΈ Views: 328      

⬇️ Download (Complete Report) Now!

DUTIES AND POSITION OF COMPANY DIRECTORS UNDER NIGERIAN COMPANY LAW

INTRODUCTION

The enormous and challenging responsibilities of managing incorporated companies are vested on directors by the Companies and Allied Matters Laws of the Federation, 2004.

Consequently I am attracted into researching about these human agents, trustees and organs of the company whose acts within the purview of the Law could be said to be the acts of the company. Though "ownership" normally are vested on shareholders (it is not the objective of this project to discuss extensively on shareholding) for they bear the ultimate risk in the event of any mishap to the company. It is an established fact that directors stand in a fiduciary relationship to the company and also owe duty of care and skill.

Generally directors owe certain obligations to the companies in the performance of their functions. It must be noted that the Act also provides for circumstances upon which a director could be removed. The responsibility of enforcing the duties of directors lies with the company, technically speaking therefore, it is the responsibility of the directors to enforce this duties. It is pertinent to note that the rule in Foss V Harbottle has been whittled down by certain exceptions, which are also statutorily provided. This project also highlights the liability of directors and when a shareholder could institute derivative action for and on behalf of the company.

1.1   WHO IS A DIRECTOR?

A director is a person duly appointed by the company to direct and manage the business of the company.1 This definition goes a step further than the 1968 Act2 by adding due appointment as a condition precedent. Section 244 (2) provides a rebuttable presumption that all persons described by a company as directors, whether as executive or otherwise, have been duly appointed. This safeguards third parties dealing with the company. In Aberdeen Railway Co. V. Blaikie Bros3, Lord. Cransworth defined directors to be somebody to whom is delegated the duty of managing the general affairs of

    1.    Sec 244(1) of the Companies and Allied Matters Act CAP C20 LFN 2004- the term "director" of a company would be defined "as a person appointed or elected according to Law, authorized to manage or direct the affairs of a company or Corporation" Sofowara, Mordern Nigerian Company Law", second edition, 2006, p.425

2.    Formally Companies Decree No. 51 of 1968 at p

3.    (1859) 3 & 4 Macq 461 at p. 471

the company. Section 245 (1) of the Act4 defines a shadow director as "any person on whose instructions and directions the directors are accustomed to act". A shadow director is also deemed to be a director. Although this definition is not explicit, it is deemed to take care of the practice where recognized groups or corporations nominate directors on another company's board to represent and protect their interests. This is usual with some banking institutions, which lend huge amounts of money to companies. Another good example of shadow director is where a government nominates some directors to represent its interest in a company where the government has substantial or controlling shares, for instance, the Nkalagu Cement Company Ltd has in its board some directors nominated by the government of Enugu, Anambra, Imo and Abia States. These four state governments could be described as shadow directors in relation to the Nkalagu Cement Company Ltd, because their nominee 'directors' are

    4. Decree No.1 of 1990 later designated as "Act"

accustomed to act on their instructions. It should be noted that the above mentioned situation is a deviation and an exception to the rule that directors must only be appointed by shareholders at a general meeting of the company as provided by Section 248 of the Company and Allied Matters Act, CAP C20 LFN 2004.

However, it is pertinent to mention that persons who give advice to directors in their professional capacities are not included in the concept of shadow directors.

πŸ“„ Pages: 65       🧠 Words: 8517       πŸ“š Chapters: 5 πŸ—‚οΈοΈ For: PROJECT

πŸ‘οΈβ€πŸ—¨οΈοΈοΈ Views: 328      

⬇️ Download (Complete Report) Now!

πŸ”— Related Topics

Malicious prosecution under the Nigerian law CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF TA’AZIR PUNISHMENTS UNDER THE KATSINA STATE SHARI’A PENAL CODE LAW, 2001 The role of legislature in impeachment proceeding under the 1999 constitution of Nigeria A Holistic Appraisal Of The Concept Of Trust Under The Nigerian Jurisprudence LEGAL REGIME OF LAND ADMINISTRATION UNDER THE ABUJA GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (AGIS) THE FARMEWORK OF ECONOMIC AND HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE ECOWAS TREATY A CRITIQUE OF THE SEPARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF COMPANIES UNDER COMPANIES AND ALLIED MATTERS ACT 2004 THE PLEA OF INSANITY IN NIGERIAN LAW AN APPRAISAL OF WOMEN'S RIGHT TO PROPERTY UNDER CUSTOMARY LAW OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF MINERAL RESOURCES UNDER THE SHARIAH AND NIGERIAN STATUTE A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONFLICT SITUATION AND CHOICE OF LAWS IN THE NIGERIAN LEGAL SYSTEM AND OTHER LEGAL SYSTEMS THE DEFENCE OF MISTAKE IN NIGERIAN LAW AN APPRAISAL OF THE LIABILITIES OF A COMPANY FOR THE ACTS OF ITS DIRECTORS AN EXAMINATION OF TAX ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS UNDER THE FEDERAL INLAND REVENUE SERVICE ACT, 2007 THE RIGHT OF AN ACCUSED PERSON UNDER THE NIGERIAN LEGAL SYSTEM AN APPRAISAL OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE NIGERIAN BANKING SECTOR ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE IN NIGERIAN LAW APPRAISAL OF IMPEACHMENT PROCESS UNDER THE 1999 CONSTITUTION OF NIGERIA A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE POWERS OF THE TAX APPEAL TRIBUNAL UNDER THE FEDERAL INLAND REVENUE SERVICE ACT, 2007 IN THE SETTLEMENT OF TAX DISPUTES IN NIGERIA THE CONCEPT OF STATE RECOGNITION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

click on whatsapp